Showing posts with label IMDB. Show all posts
Showing posts with label IMDB. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

Lie to Me - A Deceiver Remake?

Tonight marks the debut of a new show on Fox, "Lie to Me." At least, tonight, 21 Jan 09, Fox plans to show the pilot for a TV series called "Lie to Me", but IMDB is silent on whether they've filmed any episodes beyond the pilot. Fox's own website for new shows is strangely muted in how much detail it provides for "Lie to Me". However, the previews for this new show have been all over Fox's broadcasts, so I saw several during the NFL games last Sunday.

What I find most interesting about the new show is how similar the role for Tim Roth appears to another of his roles, that of James Walter Wayland in Deceiver (1997). For those readers unfamiliar with that movie, it came not long after Roth's star turns in such Quentin Tarantino films as Reservoir Dogs (1992), Pulp Fiction (1994), and Four Rooms (1995). That stretch capped an impressive run of roles for Roth that started with his playing of Gildenstern in that retelling of the classic Shakespeare story Hamlet, but from the point of view of the hired assassins, Rosencrantz & Gildenstern Are Dead (1990).

That movie was simply brilliant, and done by the same writer and director who later won Oscar for Shakespeare in Love (1998), Tom Stoppard. The fact that Shakespeare in Love was a retelling of the classic story of Romeo & Juliet from a different perspective totally gave it away as a Stoppard work. It was a nice movie, but totally didn't deserve Best Picture over Steven Spielberg's Saving Private Ryan that year.

At any rate, Roth in Deceiver plays a wealthy alcoholic who may or may not have murdered a prostitute in the park. He was the last person who saw her alive, and so the Detectives investigating the murder naturally focus their attention on Wayland. Without spoiling the ending for anyone who has not yet seen the movie, let's just say that many of the same elements shown in the previews for "Lie to Me" are also demonstrated after the Detectives hook Wayland up to a lie detector machine. Chris Penn, another veteran of some of those same Tarantino movies, and Michael Rooker did great turns as the two Detectives in the movie.

I'll probably tune in to the pilot episode tonight, just to see Roth's performance in the new show. I'll be interested to see just how similar the new role is to his past role in Deceiver. Roth seems to be an actor with an affinity for such edgy roles, so I anticipate "Lie to Me" will be good, as long as the writing works for the hour-long show.

Thursday, December 25, 2008

Merry Christmas to All!

Last night, after putting the little tykes to bed, we did what families have always done through the ages... put together all those hard to assemble Christmas gifts that "Santa" brought to the house while the kids were sleeping! Fortunately, not many batteries were required this year.

My wife's father has been extremely busy in his woodworking shop out back of their house in Stillwater, OK. He built a play kitchen for the Festival of Trees auction in November, yet still had time to build a new Thomas the Tank Engine train table, a baby doll high chair, and a baby doll rocking cradle this year. Amy got the kids an art easel, so I had to assemble that last night. Thankfully, we already bought the first bicycle in September, so I didn't have to assemble one of those last night.

While putting those things together last night, we had the Christmas classic It's a Wonderful Life (1946) on in the background. We've all seen that movie a million gazillion times, but it always brings a smile to my lips every year. I loved it when a friend of mine described it once as "Hard Core Yuletide," because that is a perfect description. Many people, of course, also know it as "Capra-corn," and that label also fits.

Several things about the movie struck me for the first time last night, however. And isn't it funny how you can be completely familiar with a movie, yet still see something new every time you see it?

The first thing that struck me (and keep in mind that we spent the majority of the evening watching A Muppets Christmas Carol (1992), rather than put up with the interminable commercial breaks on NBC, so we came in towards the end of the movie, when George was being counseled by Clarence the angel; if I'm going to sit through the entire Wonderful Life movie, I'm gonna do it by watching my own copy on DVD) was that Pottersville certainly seemed like a lot more fun town than Bedford Falls. Doesn't it seem that way? Pool halls, bars, dancing, girls... it's like Vegas without the gambling! Sure, people were miserable living in Potter's housing projects, but they had fun going out at night!

The second thing, and this is more of a reach, is that perhaps, just perhaps, the American male preference for the Girl Next Door over the Blonde Bombshell was first captured here, in Wonderful Life. Think about it: Ginger or Mary Ann? Veronica or Betty? People have been asking those questions for ages, but here you see Violet versus Mary, Gloria Grahame versus the truly classy Donna Reed. Which would you rather have as your wife? As your girlfriend, even? Which one is going to stand by you and not cheat on you with your brother or best friend? It's gotta be the Girl Next Door, in my book. Which also made for an interesting movie starring Elisha Cuthbert in 2004, but that's beside the point.

I just think it's funny that something new always presents itself on the upteenth time watching a movie. For the very first time, I noticed which book Clarence signed to George at the very end of the movie to let him know that Clarence did, indeed, win his wings by helping George not commit suicide. What was it, you ask? None other than Mark Twain's The Adventures of Tom Sawyer. That doesn't even make the trivia section on IMDB, so there's no telling if that book had special meaning for Frank Capra or anyone else associated with the movie.

Well, beyond the movies and the toys, we did have a wonderful Christmas this year. It was the very first time my wife and I hosted Christmas in our own house, and it worked out great! Our son turned over a new leaf today, or at the very least was on his best behavior this afternoon. He was very nice to everyone, hugged his little sister without being told to do so, and wished everyone a Merry Christmas on his own, without any prodding. He wasn't whiny, didn't fight a lot, and played with his new toys without getting upset or too possessive about any of them. Well, other than the new remote control Cat bulldozer from Grandpa. He really likes that one. But for a three-year-old, he did great today!

My wife's dream for peace on Earth, or at least peace in the household, was granted today. For that, I am extremely grateful! Here's hoping that everyone else experienced similar joys and peace today, and that everyone got what they needed during this holiday season. Merry Christmas, everybody!

Friday, November 7, 2008

Hollywood's Fascination with Assassins

I watched the movie Smokin' Aces (2006) the other night, and it got me started thinking about all the assassin movies that Hollywood has released recently. It's not just Hollywood, either. The European and Asian filmmakers have a long history of making films about hit men, so let's not forget about that. It could be that part of this uptick in assassin movies has something to do with American popular culture being influenced more and more by Japanese and Chinese culture.

When I did a quick keyword search on just the word assassin on IMDB, the Internet Movie Database (best resource ever!), it returned 445 hits. Some of those line items were empty, which is very curious, but they were missing other key films I consider as assassin movies, such as La Femme Nikita (1990), the Whole Nine Yards (2000), and The Boondock Saints (1999). A keyword search for the terms professional and assassin yielded just 12 hits. Obviously, IMDB doesn't index its movie resources all that effectively, and perhaps they rely on user inputs, which can be notoriously faulty.

Here's a very incomplete listing of recent films on assassins or professional hit men (and women!) that filtered through my consciousness as I thought about this topic:
  • In Bruges (2008)
  • Pineapple Express (2008); a comedy, yes, but includes hit men
  • Wanted (2008)
  • Bangkok Dangerous (2008)
  • Hitman (2007); based on videogame
  • No Country for Old Men (2007)
  • You Kill Me (2007)
  • Smokin' Aces (2006)
  • The Matador (2005)
  • Mr. and Mrs. Smith (2005)
  • Collateral (2004)
  • Usher (2004); comedy about a hit man turned movie theater attendant
  • Kill Bill, vols 1 and 2 (2003-04)
  • the Bourne trilogy about the amnesiatic hit man (2002-07)
  • Assassination Tango (2002)
  • The Road to Perdition (2002)
  • The Whole Nine Yards (2000)
  • The Boondock Saints (1999)
  • Grosse Pointe Blank (1997)
  • The Long Kiss Goodnight (1996); Geena Davis takes a turn as a female Bourne
  • Assassins (1995)
  • The Professional (1994)
  • Pulp Fiction (1994)
  • In the Line of Fire (1993)
  • Unforgiven (1992)
  • La Femme Nikita (1990)
  • The Eiger Sanction (1975)
I would even lump the first Terminator (1984) movie into this list, because yes, Arnold's time-traveling cyborg was sent back to assassinate Sarah Connor. Again, this is a very incomplete list, but there are some important points to keep in mind about these movies.

First and foremost, in the majority of these films, Hollywood shows the hit man in a favorable light and/or makes the assassin the hero/anti-hero. I'm sure Hollywood types love to romanticize the idea of the hit man; it must also generate some edgy tension in terms of making the audience care about a person they really should hate very much -- an assassin who takes a precious human life for nothing more than money. It also doesn't get much easier for a writer to show the classic man vs. man or man vs. self conflicts than by using an assassin, does it? Some of the greatest heroes in Hollywood, like Al Pacino's Michael Corleone in the first Godfather (1972) movie, took turns as killers. Who can forget the line, "Leave the gun. Take the cannoli"?

Not too many of the movies listed above actually make the assassin be the bad guy or antagonist in the storyline. Clint Eastwood's In the Line of Fire does, as Clint's Secret Service agent tries to keep John Malkovich from assassinating the President. It's hard to tell when Hollywood and other movie producers really started making the anti-hero be the protagonist (obviously, I never went to film school), but La Femme Nikita, The Professional, and Pulp Fiction took that idea and ran with it.

La Femme Nikita always struck me as being a landmark film for several reasons. First, the idea that the French government would take a female punker and turn her into a professional killer was intriguing. The relationship between Nikita and her handler was very complex, and made for a strong storyline. I omitted the Bridget Fonda remake, Point of No Return (1993), from the list above because it was awful in comparison to the original. The writer and director of Nikita, Luc Besson, also wrote and directed The Professional, also called Leon in foreign markets.

Something about The Professional always struck me as being a little bit off. At the end of the movie, no matter how much Besson wanted me to care sincerely about what happened to Jean Reno's character, I just couldn't muster that sadness. After all, Leon was a killer, and a very good one at that. Gary Oldman was definitely the bad guy in the movie, so Leon was supposed to be the father figure for Natalie Portman and so much more. Maybe my own American sensibilities couldn't fathom the purported romance between Leon and the 12 year old Mathilda, or maybe I just didn't want to get that, as objectionable as it is. I've read that European audiences were much more open to that idea, which might change the whole character of the movie. At any rate, I was never sold 100% on The Professional.

The next movie that really portrayed assassins in a favorable light was Quentin Tarantino's Pulp Fiction. I'll never forget the review I read at the time that pointed out the relationship between the two assassins played by John Travolta and Samuel L. Jackson. That relationship was grounded in the dialogue between the two, and Tarantino has always been known for his dialogue.* The assassins played a significant part in the movie, to be sure. But the movie was not just about the two hit men, and there was a little redemption at the end for Samuel L. Jackson's character, which made it easier to stomach. It's probably the best movie I've seen that is not already in my DVD collection at home.

* Forget all the obvious examples from Tarantino movies, such as the opening of Reservoir Dogs (1992), or any lines from True Romance (1993), which he wrote. Those are classics, yes. But for me, the all-time Tarantino quote came from an otherwise forgettable movie called Sleep with Me (1994). If you've seen it, you know what I'm talking about. I'm not going to cut and paste the whole thing here, but you can read it yourself at IMDB here. If you haven't seen the movie, it's not worth your time to watch it just for the Tarantino performance.

I absolutely loved Grosse Pointe Blank with John Cusack precisely because the killer was so conflicted about his role in society. He continually says that "It's not me" when talking about him fulfilling a contract to kill someone. It's not personal, although the intended victim might not feel the same way. The movie works on so many levels because it does incorporate so much psychology into the storyline, and not just in the scenes with Cusack and Alan Arkin's Dr. Oatman character. When the hit man realizes he can truly never go home again (it's been converted to a Ultimart!), it is a classic scene. It also touches on the entire conflict of whether we allow our jobs or our professional lives to dictate how we are seen in society, of defining who we are as a person. It works on so many levels, not least of which because anyone who has returned for a high school reunion can totally relate.

Given all the examples listed above, I have to say that the "assassin as good guy" plot device is getting a bit tired. In Bruges was artfully done, and the acting was top-notch. The idea that a hit man could be completely conflicted about his career choice, and made even more so because of an unintended victim during a hit on a Catholic priest, was more realistic. In the movie I just watched, Smokin' Aces, one of the German hit men used a dead man's lips (played by Ben Affleck, and how on earth did he keep from laughing while someone else was manipulating his lips and eyelids?!) to request absolution from his victim. It boggles the mind, and was perhaps the deepest part of the movie.

I couldn't help but think that I would have really liked Smokin' Aces much more about 10-15 years ago. I'm sure I've matured in the intervening time, because the overly stylized violence just made me cringe. It was very juvenile in nature, and even though the cast did a very good job with the story, I wouldn't watch it again. That's been true for some of the Guy Ritchie movies, like Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels (1998). I remember seeing that movie in the theater and being impressed with how the characters' stories all came together. It was entertaining at the time. Later, when watching the movie with my sister and a few others, it seemed to be violence just for the sake of violence, and perhaps I've outgrown that.

At any rate, Hollywood continues to pump out movies about assassins. Given that Tom Cruise's Collateral was well received, and that the Coen Brothers won Oscar gold for No Country for Old Men, I expect that trend to continue. At least until people quit going to see these movies.